If an accused person has had a bail hearing, and has been detained by the Justice of the Peace, it may be available for the accused to have a bail review. This is a hearing, usually before the Superior Court of Justice, to review the original detention order. It is not a new bail hearing. It is more like an appeal of the decision to deny the accused person bail.
There are two grounds upon which a bail review would be successful.
The first would be upon the accused person showing that the detaining Justice made an error in law in denying bail. This could be as a result of a misapplication of legal principles, a misinterpretation of the facts supporting a detention or a misapplication of the onus of proof.
Does Jason defend in my local court?
What other offences does Jason handle?
The second ground for allowing the review would be the existence of a change of circumstances. This could be the availability of a strong residential surety who was not available for consideration at the time of the original bail hearing.
If the reviewing Justice grants the application, then he would order a release upon those conditions that he thought appropriate in the circumstances of the case. If a review is denied, a further review cannot be brought for at least 30 days.